<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conybeare Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conybeare.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conybeare.com</link>
	<description>Corporate &#38; Commerical Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dismissing an Employee</title>
		<link>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/dismissing-an-employee/</link>
		<comments>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/dismissing-an-employee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conybeare Solicitors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conybeare.com/?p=6995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal has confirmed that an employer&#8217;s unambiguous notice oftermination can rarely be withdrawn. An employee will be able to take thenotice at face value, unless the employer can show that it did not intend toterminate the contract. The decision highlights the serious consequences foremployers of proceeding on the basis of a misunderstanding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Buying a Business" href="/wp-content/uploads/client_downloads/2011_Dec_DismissingAnEmployee.pdf" target="_blank"><img id="imgopacity" class="alignleft" title="Dismissing an Employee" alt="read and download this document" src="/wp-content/uploads/checklist_icon.jpg" width="93" height="126" /></a><p>The Court of Appeal has confirmed that an employer&#8217;s unambiguous notice of<br />termination can rarely be withdrawn. An employee will be able to take the<br />notice at face value, unless the employer can show that it did not intend to<br />terminate the contract. The decision highlights the serious consequences for<br />employers of proceeding on the basis of a misunderstanding with employees.</p><p>This briefing provides a timely reminder for employers wishing to dismiss an employee.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/dismissing-an-employee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)</title>
		<link>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/intellectual-property-rights-ipr/</link>
		<comments>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/intellectual-property-rights-ipr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conybeare Solicitors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conybeare.com/?p=6993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses may be interested in a number of recently-launched intellectual property (IP) initiatives. The government has announced that it will be introducing a new small-claims service for IP cases in the Patents County Court. The new process will limit fixed costs and allow damages of up to £5,000 for each case. The Intellectual Property Office [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Buying a Business" href="/wp-content/uploads/client_downloads/2011_Dec_IPR.pdf" target="_blank"><img id="imgopacity" class="alignleft" title="Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" alt="read and download this document" src="/wp-content/uploads/checklist_icon.jpg" width="93" height="126" /></a><p>Businesses may be interested in a number of recently-launched intellectual property (IP) initiatives. The government has announced that it will be introducing a new small-claims service for IP cases in the Patents County Court. The new process will limit fixed costs and allow damages of up to £5,000 for each case. The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) estimates that around 150 firms will benefit from the service every year.</p><p>This checklist highlights the key IP rights businesses need to be aware of.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/intellectual-property-rights-ipr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Settling Commercial Disputes</title>
		<link>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/settling-commercial-disputes/</link>
		<comments>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/settling-commercial-disputes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conybeare Solicitors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conybeare.com/?p=6991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A company had appointed a contractor to carry out works to a listed Victorian manor house. The parties could not agree the sum due to the contractor and the parties each commenced proceedings. Following an exchange of written settlement offers between the parties&#8217; solicitors, the parties&#8217; managing directors spoke by telephone to try to settle the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Buying a Business" href="/wp-content/uploads/client_downloads/2011_Dec_SettlingCommercialDisputes.pdf" target="_blank"><img id="imgopacity" class="alignleft" title="Settling commercial disputes" alt="read and download this document" src="/wp-content/uploads/checklist_icon.jpg" width="93" height="126" /></a><p>A company had appointed a contractor to carry out works to a listed Victorian manor house. The parties could not agree the sum due to the contractor and the parties each commenced proceedings. Following an exchange of written settlement offers between the parties&#8217; solicitors, the parties&#8217; managing directors spoke by telephone to try to settle the dispute. After the conversation, the contractor asserted that the parties had reached a binding settlement, but the company denied this. The court ruled that, as a result of the conversation, the parties had orally agreed that the company would pay the contractor £275,000 in full and final settlement.<br /> <br /> This checklist highlights the factors a business should consider when it is thinking of settling a commercial dispute.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conybeare.com/newsandviews/settling-commercial-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblowing</title>
		<link>http://conybeare.com/employment/whistleblowing/</link>
		<comments>http://conybeare.com/employment/whistleblowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conybeare Solicitors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conybeare.com/?p=6989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal has confirmed that it is easier for claimants to succeed with detriment claims than automatically unfair dismissal claims under whistleblowing legislation. A &#8220;detriment&#8221; is a disadvantage an employee has suffered because they have &#8220;blown the whistle&#8221; (for example, being over looked for a promotion or disciplined). This case highlights the importance of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Buying a Business" href="/wp-content/uploads/client_downloads/2011_Dec_Whistleblowing.pdf" target="_blank"><img id="imgopacity" class="alignleft" title="Whistleblowing" alt="read and download this document" src="/wp-content/uploads/checklist_icon.jpg" width="93" height="126" /></a><p>The Court of Appeal has confirmed that it is easier for claimants to succeed with detriment claims than automatically unfair dismissal claims under whistleblowing legislation. A &#8220;detriment&#8221; is a disadvantage an employee has suffered because they have &#8220;blown the whistle&#8221; (for example, being over looked for a promotion or disciplined). This case highlights the importance of having a whistleblowing policy in place and of providing information and training to managers on how to recognise, and properly deal with, a whistleblowing situation. <br /><br /> This checklist outlines the protection given to whistleblowers at work under English law.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conybeare.com/employment/whistleblowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Guarantees</title>
		<link>http://conybeare.com/documents/consumer-guarantees/</link>
		<comments>http://conybeare.com/documents/consumer-guarantees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conybeare Solicitors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conybeare.com/?p=6997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manufacturers are under no obligation to offer a guarantee for goods. However, if a business does offer one, this will create a legally binding contract between the business and the consumer. A business may want to offer a guarantee because it promotes the product, sets it apart from similar competitor products in the marketplace, helps establish the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="LEFT"><span style="font-size: x-small;" size="3"><a title="Consumer Guarantees" href="http://conybeare.com/wp-content/uploads/client_downloads/2011_Dec_ConsumerGuarantees.pdf" target="_blank"><img id="imgopacity" class="alignleft" title="Consumer Guarantees" alt="read and download this document" src="http://conybeare.com/wp-content/uploads/checklist_icon.jpg" width="93" height="126" /></a></span>Manufacturers are under no obligation to offer a guarantee for goods. However, if a business does offer one, this will create a legally binding contract between the business and the consumer. A business may want to offer a guarantee because it promotes the product, sets it apart from similar competitor products in the marketplace, helps establish the business as a reputable and reliable manufacturer.</p><span style="font-size: x-small;" size="2"><span style="font-size: x-small;" size="2"></span></span><p>This checklist sets out the legal obligations your business owes to a consumer if you offer a manufacturer’s guarantee with your goods.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conybeare.com/documents/consumer-guarantees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

